A Series with J. Hoberman
Throughout the delirious social spectacle known as the sixties, political events could be appreciated as movies and movies taken for political events. Fantasies contaminated and even supplanted reality in Indochina, Watts, Haight–Ashbury, and Washington, D.C. Openly hysterical low–budget movies featuring bikers and hardhats, not to mention hitherto taboo expressions of sex and violence, were imaginatively closer to what was actually going on than were expensive Hollywood productions-although, in their quest for relevance, the studios financed all manner of bizarre projects. Not since the early 1930s had the movie industry been so confused, a state of affairs that encouraged both exploitation and experimentation. And, as during the pre–Code Depression, criminal behavior was celebrated on the screen.
By the summer of 1969, Americans were living in a moment of antithetical, competing scenarios-a virtual civil war. Movies then typically remained in distribution long enough to accrue cultural baggage. The key ones were cult films writ large, their meanings determined by the reception and metaphoric use given them by their audience, whether counterculture or silent majority. Such movies provided readymade metaphors and showcased new protagonists-including the Righteous Outlaw and the Legal Vigilante-who continue to inform America's political mythology to the present day.
-J. Hoberman
J. Hoberman is a staff critic for the Village Voice and the author of The Dream Life: Movies, Media, and the Mythology of the Sixties (newly in paperback from The New Press), on which this series is based. His previous books include Vulgar Modernism: Writing on Movies and Other Media, The Magic Hour: Film at Fin de Siecle, and Bridge of Light: Yiddish Film Between Two Worlds.